Lenovo, TCL, Huawei, Haier and other Chinese enterprises "going out" at the same time, their risk not only from the market, capital and technology level, the greater risk is not entirely between countries on trade rules, etc. risk.
May 24, "Beijing News" reported on Lenovo PCs in the United States bogged down in the State Department further escalation of the circumstances surrounding the procurement crisis. U.S. State Department report said the challenge facing the United States multi-, in the 18th position will be compelled to modify the procurement process, and the commitment to purchase 16,000 Lenovo computers will be used for unclassified systems, and computer systems to greater scrutiny. Although
Lenovo Chairman Yang denied make a significant impact on Lenovo's business was, but the negative effects of the association is obvious.
As we all know, processors, memory chips, motherboard chipset, hard drive heads, optical drives and other PC components bald key technologies currently rests in the hands of the Americans or the Japanese. Association with motherboard business have "OEM" to the memory of the company do, how these devices may also increase the "back door"? Looking back, Microsoft is an out and out the U.S. company, we do not doubt Microsoft Windows sold to the Chinese government had implanted backdoors, how can American companies in their own country first suspected? Lenovo's PC to the U.S. market Reng name of IBM's Logo, or even assembled in the United States.
In this context, the author wonders whether the United States had agreed to IBM PC business to "sell" to a business association is in fact a conspiracy --- to let you see the market demand, and then let your suppliers to the U.S. procurement technology, procurement components, and other products manufactured, and U.S. suppliers made money, and also provided employment opportunities and profits of the U.S. government to tell you, I'm sorry, because you are a Chinese company to buy your product in the United States --- This is simply naked fear of fraud.
We should see that in the Lenovo, TCL, Huawei, Haier and other Chinese enterprises "going out" at the same time, their risk not only from the market, capital and technology level, the greater risk is not entirely between countries such as trade rules on the risk of unfair competition and trade barriers is still guarded Chinese enterprises "going out" the biggest constraint. When business interests rose to national interests, the United States and other Western countries is about more attention to the vital interests of their own, WTO rules in their eyes, while others only to limit the rule laid down by Bale. As some of the population as the "China threat theory" is that they include the whole of China including Chinese companies to limit and suppress the gimmicks or excuse. It can be said that this incident has given us another wake-up call, that we should not allow the immediate development of the economy at the expense of the country's long-term benefits, including the environment, resources and so on.
For Lenovo, the author considers necessary to make efforts from the following aspects: First, they must fully understand the business culture in the post-acquisition integration and market potential threats, risks, and enhance crisis prevention and control should not, speed up the internationalization process of globalization to the expense of long-term interests over commercial compromise; Second, as China's flagship enterprises, associations should take the lead in strengthening the core technology research and development and improve the overall competitiveness of enterprises, self-improvement, self-pressurized, and a large number of Chinese enterprises hardships, strong themselves, Mass for the growing strength of Chinese companies do a good job "running marathon" long-term trial preparation; Third, we should argue, solemn representations to the courage to protect the legitimate business interests from infringement, and in accordance with international common law to the relevant measures.
In addition, relevant government departments of the Chinese enterprises to go abroad should provide more support and assistance for Chinese enterprises in overseas markets, international competition to create a fair and just competition, to take relevant measures to safeguard national interests and Chinese enterprises interest, properly handle trade disputes settlement.
Moreover, in others we have limits, we should also be abolished as soon as possible foreign investment in China, preferential policies and super-national treatment, on the technology and equipment from abroad should also take the relevant safety certification, monitoring and verification for all types of enterprises to create a truly fair and just competition environment.